Fuzzy tactics aren't helping the Mac community

A blog post has been rising up the digg ranks (though has been finally marked inaccurate) that utilizes some fuzzy math in an attempt to prove that the 5 iteratio of Mac OS X have been cheaper to update than the 1 version of Windows released during Mac OS X's existence. While the pro ect of this might sound great to many Mac users (myself included) who have been purchasing the recent Mac OS X releases at retail value, there are some serious flaws in this post's math that not only undermine the premise, but are also doing a significant di ervice to the Mac community by lying to make a point and earning so much bad PR because of it (yes, at times, there is such a thing as bad PR).

The problem is that the author excludes an iteration or two of Mac OS X from the final cost of ownership because he didn't deem them worthy for one subjective reason or another. To make matters worse, he then includes premium Windows services on top of the cost of a Windows lice e, such as yearly Norton AntiVirus su criptio and yearly yware + security cleanings from Geek Squad. While there is certainly an easy argument to be made for the virtual nece ity for some kind of security and virus software that (amazingly) i 't included with Windows itself, there are plenty of similar services available, sometimes with free and open source alternatives, which cause me to su ect the author of seeking out the most expe ive services he could find to fuel a blatantly biased opinion.

Posts like this that use underhanded techniques and shoddy math to prove a biased point aren't helping the Mac community. In fact, they're making it look even worse because, once found out, they are (rightfully) tra formed into key evidence for cluele A le fanaticism, which can easily harm the reputation of almost anyone with something genuinely educated and relevant to say about A le or their products, whether it's a good or *ga * u leasant statement.

These wholly inaccurate and misleading articles need to stop if computer users are going to learn the genuine advantages (and even disadvantages) of A le and their products. Lying to grab attention for A le may briefly taste sweet, but helping co umers make an educated choice (no matter what the outcome) based on pure, true merit takes the cake.